Shared Plans Prompts

INPUTS [Purpose]; [agreed participants]; [confirmed time and place] PROMPT Create a simple plan for [purpose] using [agreed participants] and [confirmed time and place]. Separate confirmed arrangements from things needing agreement. Include a short preparation list and a message for open questions. Do not invent attendance, availability or anyone’s needs.

Try this follow-up
Make a minimum version that still serves the gathering’s purpose.

Check before using
Confirm arrangements with the people involved.

INPUTS [Activity]; [known details]; [recipient relationship] PROMPT Write three invitation options for [activity] using [known details] and [recipient relationship]. Keep the message specific, friendly and low-pressure. Leave unconfirmed details as questions rather than promises. Do not add guilt, false urgency or an invented special occasion.

Try this follow-up
Choose the most natural option and shorten it.

Check before using
Use details you actually know.

INPUTS [Original plan]; [actual change]; [possible alternative] PROMPT Draft a message about a change to [original plan] using [actual change] and [possible alternative]. Be clear and considerate without inventing a reason. Distinguish an offer to discuss an alternative from a confirmed new arrangement.

Try this follow-up
Make a shorter version with the same meaning.

Check before using
Choose how much personal context you want to share.

INPUTS [Group ideas]; [shared purpose]; [fixed constraints] PROMPT Organise [group ideas] around [shared purpose] and [fixed constraints]. Identify compatible ideas, trade-offs and questions requiring agreement. Present a few options in comparable language. Do not claim consensus or assign preferences people did not state.

Try this follow-up
Create a short decision message the group can respond to.

Check before using
Have participants confirm the choice.

INPUTS [Request]; [what you can offer]; [relationship context] PROMPT Draft a respectful response to [request] using [what you can offer] and [relationship context]. State the boundary clearly and include an alternative only if supplied. Avoid diagnosing the other person, assigning motives or inventing an excuse. Give two tone options with the same boundary.

Try this follow-up
Make the chosen version sound more like my own wording [sample].

Check before using
Use a boundary you are willing and able to maintain.

INPUTS [Trip idea]; [confirmed travellers’ needs]; [unknowns] PROMPT Create a shared planning question list for [trip idea] using [confirmed travellers’ needs] and [unknowns]. Separate decisions about timing, transport and activities from provider facts to verify. Do not invent availability, visa requirements, opening hours or prices. Keep the output as questions, not a booked plan.

Try this follow-up
Choose the questions that must be answered before comparing options.

Check before using
Check current requirements and details with appropriate official providers.

INPUTS [Celebration]; [confirmed arrangements]; [tasks]; [availability] PROMPT Organise [tasks] for [celebration] using [confirmed arrangements] and [availability]. Group preparation, day-of actions and unresolved decisions. Suggest responsibility options clearly marked for agreement. Do not assume someone volunteered or add purchases and commitments not supplied.

Try this follow-up
Write a concise confirmation message for the proposed responsibilities.

Check before using
Confirm each person’s agreement before treating the list as final.

INPUTS [What someone did]; [specific moment]; [tone] PROMPT Draft a thank-you using [what someone did] and [specific moment] in [tone]. Keep it natural and concrete. Do not invent feelings, a lifelong impact or details absent from my notes. Offer a brief message and a slightly longer note.

Try this follow-up
Make the chosen version sound closer to these words I use [sample].

Check before using
Keep only sentiments you actually mean.

INPUTS [Observed problem]; [effect on you]; [desired practical change] PROMPT Help prepare a conversation about [observed problem] using [effect on you] and [desired practical change]. State observable facts, explain the practical effect and ask a clear question. Avoid labels, accusations and guesses about motives. Suggest an opening, not a scripted argument.

Try this follow-up
Make the opening shorter and leave room for the other person’s explanation.

Check before using
Choose a suitable time and use your own judgement about the relationship.

INPUTS [What was planned]; [what happened]; [feedback agreed to share] PROMPT Review [what was planned] against [what happened] and [feedback agreed to share]. Identify one arrangement that worked, one gap and one question for next time. Avoid blame or invented satisfaction scores. Keep the review focused on practical changes the group can discuss.

Try this follow-up
Write a brief note inviting confirmation of the lesson.

Check before using
Use actual observations and appropriate sharing.