Languages And Localization Prompts

INPUTS
[target language]; [level]; [scenario]; [correction preference]

PROMPT
Act as a conversation partner in the target language. Start a realistic exchange for the scenario and wait for my response. Keep vocabulary and sentence complexity appropriate to my level while introducing a few useful new expressions. Correct the most important errors according to my preference without interrupting every sentence. Explain corrections briefly in my chosen support language. Maintain the scenario and ask natural follow-up questions. At the end, summarize recurring mistakes, useful phrases, and one focused practice exercise based on the conversation.

INPUTS
[source text]; [source language]; [target language]; [audience]; [register]

PROMPT
Translate the text while preserving meaning, factual details, tone, and intent. Match the specified register and audience rather than translating every expression literally. Retain names, quantities, and formatting where appropriate. Flag ambiguous passages and culturally specific references instead of guessing silently. Provide the translation and a short translator's note explaining important choices or unresolved meanings. Offer alternatives for phrases with materially different interpretations. Do not add claims or remove qualifications merely to make the text sound smoother.

INPUTS
[source copy]; [target locale]; [brand voice]; [product details]; [constraints]

PROMPT
Localize the supplied website copy for the target locale. Adapt phrasing, examples, date and number formats, and calls to action while preserving the actual offer. Flag market-specific claims, payment details, or requirements that need current local verification. Provide the localized copy and a change log explaining substantive adaptations. Keep terminology consistent and identify text that may require layout changes because of length. End with a reviewer checklist and questions for a native subject specialist before publication.

INPUTS
[word list]; [language]; [level]; [topic]; [preferred practice]

PROMPT
Teach the vocabulary through realistic context. For each item, provide a plain explanation, a natural example, a common word combination, and one useful contrast with a similar expression. Mark differences in formality or regional use when relevant. Create a short dialogue using several items and a retrieval exercise with answers placed separately. Avoid obscure synonyms that do not suit the level. End with a small review plan and questions that test whether I can use the words appropriately rather than merely recognize them.

INPUTS
[my writing]; [target language]; [level]; [learning goal]

PROMPT
Review my writing to identify the most important grammar patterns affecting clarity. Group recurring errors instead of listing every minor issue separately. For each pattern, explain the rule simply, show a correction from my text, and provide one contrastive example. Preserve my intended meaning and flag ambiguity. Return a corrected version and three short exercises targeting the main patterns, with answers separated. End with a priority order for practice and distinguish grammatical errors from acceptable stylistic variation.

INPUTS
[language]; [recipient relationship]; [purpose]; [facts]; [register]

PROMPT
Draft a professional email in the requested language that fits the recipient relationship and local conventions. State the purpose early, organize supporting facts clearly, and finish with a specific next step. Preserve supplied names, dates, and commitments. Provide a natural version and a more formal alternative, explaining the difference in tone. Include an appropriate subject line and sign-off. End with a short glossary of useful expressions. Do not assume a level of familiarity or authority that the context does not establish.

INPUTS
[source documents]; [language pair]; [industry]; [existing terminology]

PROMPT
Create a bilingual glossary for the supplied documents. Identify important recurring terms and provide the preferred translation, definition, context example, and any acceptable alternative. Distinguish ordinary words from technical terms with specialized meanings. Flag ambiguous terms and inconsistencies in existing translations. Use the provided terminology as authoritative where specified, while noting conflicts. Deliver a structured glossary and a brief usage guide. End with terms requiring subject-matter review before the glossary is used across customer-facing or technical material.

INPUTS
[expressions]; [language]; [level]; [communication context]

PROMPT
Explain the expressions in context, focusing on meaning, tone, typical situations, and possible misunderstandings. Give natural examples and a plain alternative for each. Identify which expressions are casual, formal, regional, or potentially awkward in the specified context. Do not assume every idiom has a direct equivalent in another language. Create a short choice exercise that asks which expression fits each situation, with explanations in a separate answer key. End with the two expressions most useful for my immediate communication goal.

INPUTS
[target language]; [role]; [experience]; [interview format]; [level]

PROMPT
Run a realistic job interview in the target language. Ask one question at a time and wait for my answer. Use questions relevant to the role and my actual experience. After each response, provide brief feedback on clarity, language accuracy, and how well it answers the question. Suggest a stronger version without inventing qualifications or achievements. Gradually include follow-up questions. At the end, summarize recurring language issues, useful professional phrases, and three targeted exercises for the next practice session.

INPUTS
[source]; [translation]; [language pair]; [audience]; [terminology rules]

PROMPT
Review the translation against the source for accuracy, omissions, additions, terminology, tone, and naturalness. Identify issues by location and classify them by impact. Explain why a change is needed and provide a corrected version. Preserve acceptable choices rather than replacing every sentence with your preference. Flag ambiguity in the source separately from translation errors. Deliver an issue table and revised text. End with unresolved questions for the author or specialist and a check of names, numbers, dates, and qualifications.